ANTALYA BİLİM UNIVERSITY
Course Information Package

IAED 2203 - History of Interior Design II

Basic Information

Course Code:
IAED 2203
Course Name:
History of Interior Design II
Language of Instruction:
English
Course Type:
Class
Course Level:
Bachelor
ECTS:
4.00
Instructor:
Dr. GAMZE AKYOL

Course Objectives

The aim of the course is to provide students with basic information about the history of interior design from the Renaissance to the present.

Course Content

Concepts such as functionality, safety, hygiene, comfort, mobility, etc., will be discussed over the interior spaces of different periods and societies in the course, which considers space as a complex social issue.

Prerequisites / Corequisites

None

Course Books / Materials / Recommended Resources

Ireland, J. (2009) History of Interior Design, New York: Fairchild Books, Inc.Anne Massey, 2001. Interior Design of the 20th Century,The Beginnings of Architecture, Gideon, S, New York, 1964.Pile, J. F. (2005) A History of Interior Design, Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons. Pile J. and Gura J. 2013, A History of Interior Design, Wiley and Sons Publishing.Hinchman M. 2009, History of Furniture: A Global View, Fairchild Books. Sparke, P. 1998, A Century of Design: Design Pioneers of The 20th Century, Mitchell Beazley Publishing.Miller J. 1998, The Style Sourcebook: The definite Visual Directory of Fabrics Wallpapers Paints Flooring Tiles, Mitchell Beazley Publishing.Gideon, S.   (1964) ""The Beginnings of Architecture"", Princeton University Pres, New York

Learning Outcomes

Code Description
LO1 Understanding that human and environmental conditions vary according to geographical location and affect design and construction decisions.
LO2 Gain awareness of the basic context and framework of history as it relates
LO3 Understanding the basic context and framework of history, based on interior design
LO4 Understanding interior design styles and movements

Weekly Course Content

Week Content
1 Course introduction- overview
2 Victorian Era
3 Arts and Crafts Movement
4 Art Nouveau
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 General evaluation for project preparation
15 General evaluation for project preparation

Workload Calculation

Activity Count Duration (Hours) Total
Attendance 14 3.00 42.00
Post-Prectice Individual Study 12 2.00 24.00
Midterm Exam/Preparation 1 9.00 9.00
Final Exam/Preparation 1 11.00 11.00
Homework 2 4.00 8.00
Total Workload (Hours) 94
ECTS Credit (Workload / 25) 3

Assessment

# Assessment Type Contribution (%)
1 Midterm Exam %30
2 Homework %20
3 Homework %10
4 Final Exam %40
TOTAL %100

PO - LO Matrix

PO \ LO
LO1
LO2
LO3
LO4
PO-1
PO-2
PO-3
PO-4
PO-5
PO-6
PO-7
PO-8
PO-9
PO-10
PO-11
PO-12
PO-13
1
Low Contribution
2
Medium Contribution
3
High Contribution

Teaching and Learning Methods

# Method Name Description Tools
1 Lecture (expository teaching), interactive discussion Listening and taking notes. Standard classroom technologies, multimedia tools (projector, computer, digital presentations)
2 Group Work Students determine the slope and cross-sectional geometric characteristics of a parabolic irrigation canal on campus, plot the flow rate curve at different sections of the canal, and submit a report. Land surveying instruments
3 Homework Solving and analyzing homework questions using a computer and Excel. Computer
4 Guest Speaker Listening and comprehension, observation/processing situations Standard classroom technologies, multimedia tools, projector, computer, overhead projector, special equipment

Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence

Violations of scholastic honesty include, but are not limited to cheating, plagiarizing, fabricating information or citations, facilitating acts of dishonesty by others, having unauthorized possession of examinations, submitting work of another person or work previously used without informing the instructor, or tampering with the academic work of other students. Any for of scholastic dishonesty is a serious academic violation and will result in a disciplinary action.Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI):Students are permitted to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools (such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, etc.) for grammar correction and academic writing improvement throughout their work. However, AI-generated original content (e.g., analysis, paragraph writing, conceptual description, etc.) must not exceed 20% of the submitted material.In any case where AI tools are used, students are required to include a clear declaration within the assignment/report/submission. This declaration must include the name of the AI tool/model used, the specific purpose, and a brief explanation of how it contributed to the work.Example declaration:"I used ChatGPT-4 for proofreading and restructuring the introductory paragraph."Failure to declare the use of AI tools when applied will be treated as a violation of academic integrity and plagiarism policies and may result in disciplinary action.